guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add git-review.


From: Efraim Flashner
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add git-review.
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:58:01 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:28:37PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> Hi there, thanks for the patch. I do not have any experience with Gerrit but
> some comments below:
> 
> 
> On 08/09/16 17:06, Clément Lassieur wrote:
> > [..]
> > +    (source
> > +     (origin
> > +       (method url-fetch)
> > +       (uri (string-append
> > +             
> > "https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/g/git-review/git-review-";
> > +             version ".tar.gz"))
> 
> Rather: (uri (pypi-uri "git-review" version))
> 
> > +       (sha256
> > +        (base32
> > +         "07d1jn9ryff5j5ic6qj5pbk10m1ccmpllj0wyalrcms1q9yhlzh8"))))
> > +    (build-system python-build-system)
> > +    (arguments `(#:tests? #f)) ; tests require a running Gerrit server
> > +    (native-inputs
> > +     `(("python-pbr" ,python-pbr)))
> > +    (inputs
> > +     `(("python-requests" ,python-requests)
> > +       ("git" ,git)))
> 
> I think including git simply as an input is problematic because git-review
> calls git via 'subprocess', as evidenced by
> 
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix environment -C --ad-hoc git-review
> $ git-review
> [..]
>   File 
> "/gnu/store/m4gc2wx4q9if1vrhgclpspdil7rqsn21-python-3.4.3/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py",
> line 1457, in _execute_child
>     raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg)
> FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'git'
> 
> So, I think we need to patch the source code to call the full path to git,
> or otherwise wrap the 'git-review' executable.
> 
> > +    (home-page "http://docs.openstack.org/infra/git-review/";)
> > +    (synopsis "Command-line tool for Gerrit")
> > +    (description
> > +     "Git-review is a command-line tool that helps submitting Git branches 
> > to
> > +Gerrit for review, or fetching existing ones.")
> > +    (license asl2.0)))
> Otherwise seems OK to me. Can you test with environment -C -N?
> ben
> 

Oh no! I just pushed this.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]