guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Addition to gnu-build-system: make test.


From: ng0
Subject: Re: Addition to gnu-build-system: make test.
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:46:19 +0000

Can we ease it up in a different way for applications which do not have
aliases?
Maybe using something like
#:check-is-tests? #t in the arguments, which fails when check and test
exist?

John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:

> [ Unknown signature status ]
> "make check" is what the Gnu Coding Standards specify:
> http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Standard-Targets
>
> So I think it should stay as it is - at least for the gnu-build-system
>
> J'
>
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:05:47PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>      On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:14:25PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
>      > 
>      > 2016-08-26 15:16 <ng0> recently when I pointed out to someone and they
>      > added a make check which just calls the original make test, I was
>      > wondering if our gnu build system should try for make test and make
>      > check.. this seems to be very common test instead of check
>      > 2016-08-26 15:19 <kyamashita> ng0: Or maybe try one if the other fails?
>      > 2016-08-26 15:19 <ng0> yes.. very often I had to replace check with 
> just
>      > test
>      > 2016-08-26 15:21 <kyamashita> It might be worth bringing up on the
>      > guix-devel mailing list to see what others think.
>      > 2016-08-26 15:21 <ng0> yes.. I will do so later
>      > 
>      > What do others think? How can we extend gnu-build-system so that make
>      > test can be used but make check is not ignored?
>      > -- 
>      > ng0
>      > For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
>      > 
>      
>      I was curious how many times we use test-target:
>      
>      $ grep test-target gnu/packages/*scm | wc -l
>      87
>      $ grep test-target gnu/packages/*scm | grep \"test\" | wc -l
>      52
>      $ grep test-target gnu/packages/*scm | grep \"tests\" | wc -l
>      8
>      
>      I guess the real question is, will running an extra `make test' after
>      `make check' break anything? Also, I'm sure some of the makefiles have
>      one as an alias of the other, we don't want to run the tests twice.
>      
>      
>      -- 
>      Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   ?????????? ??????????
>      GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
>      Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received 
> unencrypted
>
>
>
> -- 
> Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encryted email.
> PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
> fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
> See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
>

-- 
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]