[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.
From: |
Alex Vong |
Subject: |
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs. |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 23:18:47 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Hi guixers,
Actually, We have GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations
<https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.html>, which was
published recently (about 1 yr ago).
Below is my understanding of the evaluations:
The essence of the criteria
<https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.html> is that, web service
is different from software, we (as users) cannot modify the software on
other's server. So, it is not about free or non-free. Rather, it is
about other ethical issues, e.g. privacy, accept users from all
countries...
Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:53:49 +0200
> Hartmut Goebel <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> A good alternative could be to use gitlab, which one could host on one's
>> own systems. It is "only" MIT licensed, but at least "open source" - in
>> contrast to github, which is propritary.
>
> I second the gitlab recommendation. I have multiple servers that use
> gitlab and it's very nice. It supports merge requests, continuous
> integration buiulds etc.
Agree, if we were to host it on our own server, then we simply need to
follow the criteria and be done with it. Of course, there are other
alternatives, such as gogs, which is used by `notabug.org'.
Cheers,
Alex
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., (continued)
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., ng0, 2016/08/13
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Pjotr Prins, 2016/08/14
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., ng0, 2016/08/14
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., David Craven, 2016/08/14
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Pjotr Prins, 2016/08/15
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., David Craven, 2016/08/15
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/16
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Pjotr Prins, 2016/08/16
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Hartmut Goebel, 2016/08/15
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Danny Milosavljevic, 2016/08/15
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs.,
Alex Vong <=
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Hartmut Goebel, 2016/08/16
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Alex Vong, 2016/08/16
- Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., Hartmut Goebel, 2016/08/18
Re: Feedback, ideas, discussion: tracking patches, discussions, bugs., David Craven, 2016/08/16