[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Help with Perl security update
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Help with Perl security update |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jul 2016 17:09:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:23:37PM +0200, Tomáš Čech wrote:
> This looks like we're missing some patches. My guess is that this is
> consequence of the fact that upstream is on 5.22.2 already and we're
> on 5.22.1. I'm not sure what value to choose here as the result won't
> be neither 3.56_01 nor 3.56_02. Maybe add extra suffix?
>
> Or we can just skip bfe2dd1e9c3296bebf3ab9adc2ca48d3eb8d105d and let
> the version same. Someone with deeper perl experience should decide.
Thanks for digging in. I agree, someone with deeper knowledge of Perl
should make this choice. I don't understand the implications of omitting
the patch.