Re: [PATCH] add address@hidden

[Matthew Jordan]

>>     (version "1.6.2")

I'll update the version in an updated patch. Assuming no problems I'll
be happy to submit it.

>>                (zero? (system* "sh" "all.bash")))))
>
> This seems to work, but I think it should just be `(zero? (system*
> "./all.bash"))`. It has a shebang, and expects bash, not sh.

Doesn't sh already handle picking the shell/interpretor?  That's why I
put it there. sh or an sh compatible shell is usually the first to
start. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

> If it doesn't cause any problems, we should delete pkg/bootstrap/* so
> that it doesn't retain any references to address@hidden I think that would
> drastically reduce the size of its closure.

I'll look into this and get back to you.

> Also, I'm not sure I'm sold on splitting up into multiple outputs, but I
> haven't thought about it much and don't have a strong opinion. The
> "tests" output is only 5M and "doc" is only 10M, vs 270M for the default
> output.

This sounds like the beginning of a long conversation. Suffice to say
it's doesn't bother me either way.  However I would rather change this
in later patch, if it has to be changed.

Respectuflly,

Matthew Jordan