[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Install gpg2 as gpg
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Install gpg2 as gpg |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:10:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 10:56:05PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
> > Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> Anyway, this patch is just about how we name the command. That the
> >>> command is called ‘gpg2’ is a well-known annoyance, and Werner
> >>> recommends not doing that anyway.
> >>
> >> Is there a consensus on the way forward? Should we apply this patch to
> >> gnupg-2.1?
> >
> > To me it seems the answer is “yes”. If you want to be sure, please
> > leave another couple of days before pushing. :-)
> >
> >> Is anyone willing to test and maintain patches against gnupg-2.0 (not
> >> me)?
>
> I finally did that in commit bc85b127df622575988f8e760f72d608d0900a75.
>
> Now, address@hidden provides the ‘gpg’ and ‘gpgv’ commands, in addition to
> ‘gpg2’ and ‘gpgv2’ (to ease transition).
And I just pushed a change that has a similar effect for address@hidden as
163708a66.