[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: none
From: |
myglc2 |
Subject: |
Re: none |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:38:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Roel,
>
> Roel Janssen <address@hidden> skribis:
>
[...]
>
>> One thing that really helped me in reducing the time to contribute
>> changes to the upstream distribution, is to have a good workflow. I
>> ended up doing the following:
>> 1. Make the changes.
>> 2. Commit the changes.
>> 3 git format-patch -1 --no-attach
>> 4. git reset --hard <latest commit on origin/master>
>> 5. Submit the patch to the mailing list
>> 6. Wait for response and probably go back to 1.
>>
>> I made all of my changes on a GNU Guix git checkout. So, not writing
>> package definitions on a separate repository.
>
> Do you think it would help to add this as a section in the manual?
This is a great idea!
- Re: none, (continued)
- Re: none, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/07/24
- Re: none, Andreas Enge, 2016/07/24
- Re: none, Roel Janssen, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Vincent Legoll, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/22
- Re: none,
myglc2 <=
- Re: none, Tomáš Čech, 2016/07/23
- Review process, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/22
- Re: Review process, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/22
- Re: Review process, Alex Kost, 2016/07/23
- Re: Review process, Mathieu Lirzin, 2016/07/23
- Re: Review process, Alex Kost, 2016/07/24
- Re: Review process, Mathieu Lirzin, 2016/07/24
- Re: Review process, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/24
- A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/23
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2016/07/24