[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:15:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls)[replacement]: New field.
> > (gnutls/fixed): New variable.
>
> Mark pointed out that using a graft won't work, since the ungrafted and
> unpatched gnutls will still need to be built.
>
> Any ideas?
Unfortunately, the version of gnutls in core-updates (3.5.0) does not
include the fix. It was introduced in 3.5.2.
- gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, nee, 2016/07/16
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/17
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Andreas Enge, 2016/07/17
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/17
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/17
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/18
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/18
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/19
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/19
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/20
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/20
- Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure, Efraim Flashner, 2016/07/18
- gd on i686, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/19