Re: [PATCH 00/14] modular qt patches

[Andreas Enge]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:58:58PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I haven't checked if there's a good upstream source, but a good
> addition to the description could be: "This provides the qtsvg module"
> (for qtsvg), or "This package provides the qtconcurrent, qtcore, qtdbus,
> qtgui, qtopenglextensions, qtplatformheaders, qtplatformsupport,
> qtprintsupport, qtsql, qttest, qtwidgets, qtxml modules." (for qtbase).

The first one is a bit redundant, the second one useful. Maybe other packages
will also provide more than one module, then this text would be helpful.
I would suggest to capitalise them as in the library names, such as
"Qt5Concurrent" etc.. What do you think?

Concerning Mesa, I agree that it should probably not be propagated by
qtbase.

Andreas