[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnun
From: |
Nils Gillmann |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl) |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2016 17:55:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Nils Gillmann <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> In this case I have to disagree.
>> I would if I could, but I had a conversation with Christian about
>> it*. The most useable GNUnet right now for us is the SVN
>
> [...]
>
>> From my perspective I want people to have a good experience of
>> trying out (that's the way you should put it at this stage with
>> this gnunet-setup and no applications like SecuShare being ready)
>> the GNUnet. You experience will be outdated with 0.10.1,
>
> Right, but my point is that it is up to GNUnet as a project to send
> users the right message. As a user, I expect to use releases rather
> than pick an arbitrary commit.
I see nothing arbitrary in tested SVN commit numbers, but I get
your point.
> As a distro, our job is not to choose the commit that will give users “a
> good experience”; this is upstream’s job.
I am more involved with talking, providing ideas to subprojects
and changing public appearance etc and not with coding so much,
so I leave that to people more involved in GNUnet coding.
> IOW, we must tweak Christian et al. into making a new release. :-)
Which should be clear from the threads I mentioned which contain
the longer explanations, that it is a matter of some
bugfixes. Anyone reading this thread and feeling comfortable with
hacking on GNUnet and fixing the bug would be very welcome.
> Now, it’s not the end of the world if we provide a development snapshot
> of GNUnet, and it’s a win if people find it useful. But we must keep in
> mind that this is an exception.
Of course, I don't see this as a regular way of working around
issues, but it's an issue I want to work around this way.
> Does that make sense?
>
> Ludo’.
thanks,
--
ng
personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org
EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/EDN
- [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/11
- Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl), Ludovic Courtès, 2016/03/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/14
- Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl), Ludovic Courtès, 2016/03/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl),
Nils Gillmann <=
- Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/22
- Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/24
- Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/28
- [PATCH 1] gnurl (was Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl)), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/28
- Re: [PATCH 1] gnurl (was Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl)), Leo Famulari, 2016/03/28
- Re: [PATCH 1] gnurl (was Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl)), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/28
- Re: [PATCH 1] gnurl (was Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl)), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/30
[PATCH 2] gnunet: description (was Re: [PATCH] gnunet.scm -> various changes (description update, adds gnunet-svn, gnunet-gtk-svn, gnurl)), Nils Gillmann, 2016/03/28