[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Missing patch on savannah means coreutils can't build
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Missing patch on savannah means coreutils can't build |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:27:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Ludovic,
Is there way to change the URI used to fetch the coreutils patch
'coreutils-tail-inotify-race.patch', as I tried to do in 1a51cbc825,
but without triggering a full rebuild?
Mark
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Efraim Flashner writes:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:19:51 -0800
>>>> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Earlier today I tried doing a build without substitutes. I was
>>>>> surprised to see this error:
>>>>>
>>>>> Starting download of
>>>>> /gnu/store/hg3692jqq4jmhg4qx8d7y67fspimy898-?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0
>>>>> From
>>>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/patch/?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0...
>>>>> patch 1.2MiB/s 00:00 | 1KiB
>>>>> transferred
>>>>> output path
>>>>> `/gnu/store/hg3692jqq4jmhg4qx8d7y67fspimy898-?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0'
>>>>> should have sha256 hash
>>>>> `1dnlszhc8lihhg801i9sz896mlrgfsjfcz62636prb27k5hmixqz', instead has
>>>>> `0zygncr1z1nswmny2vl1havfqswm40vzj0vjvhf5yndavhzr267j'
>>>>>
>>>>> From the coreutils definition:
>>>>> (patches
>>>>> (list (origin
>>>>> (method url-fetch)
>>>>> (uri
>>>>> "http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/\
>>>>> patch/?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0")
>>>>> (sha256
>>>>> (base32
>>>>>
>>>>> "1dnlszhc8lihhg801i9sz896mlrgfsjfcz62636prb27k5hmixqz"))
>>>>> (file-name "coreutils-tail-inotify-race.patch"))))))
>>>>>
>>>>> But indeed, it's not surprising that there's a hash mismatch... there's
>>>>> nothing here!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/patch/?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I updated coreutils on core-updates which included removing the patch from
>>>> the package definition.
>>>
>>> Thanks! In case it's useful, here's a patch which includes the patch
>>> itself rather than pulling it down via http.
>>
>> I fixed this differently, in commit 1a51cbc825, by simply removing the
>> "/" before the "?" in the URL.
>
> I had to revert this, because it caused a full rebuild.
> To be continued...
>
> Mark