Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages

[Alex Kost]

Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-04 00:11 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> From e040b70e23f04fca1c91123751ce8b6e28719bb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Kost <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:12:28 +0300
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bash-light: Rename to bash-minimal.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/bash.scm (bash-light): Rename to ...
>>   (bash-minimal): ...this.
>>   (static-bash): Use it.
>> * gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm (%bash-static): Use it.
>
> This should go to ‘core-updates’, where there’s an additional reference
> to update in commencement.scm.  OK with this change.

I made this patch specifically for ‘core-updates’ and I don't see any
reference to ‘bash-light’ in (gnu packages commencement) there.  AFAICS
‘bash-light’ is used in ‘static-bash-for-glibc’ only in master.  Or do I
miss anything?

I have also noticed that there is another ‘…-light’ package in
‘core-updates’ — ‘coreutils-light’, so I'm attaching the patch to rename
this one as well.

0001-gnu-coreutils-light-Rename-to-coreutils-minimal.patch
Description: Text Data