[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: elogind status
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: elogind status |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:01:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu 27 Aug 2015 15:21, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> First of all you need some extra file systems. These paths provide a
>> documented interface to logind information:
>>
>> (file-system
>> (device "systemd")
>> (mount-point "/run/systemd")
>> (type "tmpfs")
>> (check? #f)
>> (flags '(no-suid no-dev no-exec))
>> (options "mode=0755")
>> (create-mount-point? #t))
>> (file-system
>> (device "systemd")
>> (mount-point "/run/user")
>> (type "tmpfs")
>> (check? #f)
>> (flags '(no-suid no-dev no-exec))
>> (options "mode=0755")
>> (create-mount-point? #t))
>
> We should add them to %base-file-systems or something.
Could we mount all of /run on a tmpfs? Maybe that wouldn't work for
some reason. If it's possible we should do it though.
>> (mingetty-service "tty1" #:motd motd #:additional-session-modules
>> (list pam-elogind))
>
> Now I understand; sorry for not reading messages in the right order!
>
> So I think %desktop-services should map over %base-services and simply
> add the session module, as I suggested in the other thread. WDYT?
>
> If the user adds another login-capable service and forgets to add the
> ‘pam-elogind’ PAM service in there, there’s a problem, but maybe that’s
> acceptable as a first step?
I'll give it a go :)
Andy
- Re: elogind status, (continued)
- Re: elogind status, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/08/27
- Re: elogind status,
Andy Wingo <=