Re: [PATCH] Add Non Sequencer.

[Ricardo Wurmus]

> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> From 57265b8363add56ea0ea2f35310c39db7e2b14ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:46:44 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add NTK.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/fltk.scm (ntk): New variable.
>
> [...]
>
>> +    (license lgpl2.0)))
>
> Version 2.0-only?

I copied this from “fltk” because it’s a fork and the author wrote that
the license is the same as for “fltk”.  Now looking at the copyright
headers I see the “or later” clause repeatedly.  Does this mean that the
license for our “fltk” package is incorrect?  Should it not also be
“lgpl2.0+” then?

> Otherwise LGTM.
>
>> From f748fa7439382672a5951beee6d00fd0f6e80221 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:47:54 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add Non Sequencer.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/music.scm (non-sequencer): New variable.
>
> OK!

Thanks for the review!

~~ Ricardo