[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 5/5] gnu: Add emacs-mmm-mode
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 5/5] gnu: Add emacs-mmm-mode |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:19:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Alex Kost <address@hidden> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès (2015-07-04 18:16 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> I think I've found a problem with downloading packages from melpa-stable
>>> (probably the same will be with 'melpa', but I don't know). I tried to
>>> build this 'emacs-mmm-mode' package but it failed because
>>> <http://stable.melpa.org/packages/mmm-mode-0.5.2.tar> does not exist
>>> anymore (because the current version is 0.5.4).
>>
>> If tarball deletion or renaming is common on MELPA, then maybe we could
>> address it by providing an additional alternate URL, as is done for
>> ‘lftp’ and other packages. WDYT?
>
> If I understand correctly, there is no alternative URL. Only URL for a
> latest version. (but I may be wrong)
emacs-mmm-mode is failing to build on hydra, because the downloaded
tarball doesn't match the expected hash:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/563640/nixlog/1/tail-reload
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
starting download of
`/gnu/store/gdwf9rsqvvqqb77qkgpp94w8k8z1i6wf-mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar' from
`http://stable.melpa.org/packages/mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar'...
http://stable.melpa.org/.../mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar 0.0% of 300.0 KiB (0. KiB/s)
http://stable.melpa.org/.../mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar 21.3% of 300.0 KiB (405. KiB/s)
http://stable.melpa.org/.../mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar 42.7% of 300.0 KiB (372. KiB/s)
http://stable.melpa.org/.../mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar 64.0% of 300.0 KiB (439. KiB/s)
http://stable.melpa.org/.../mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar 85.3% of 300.0 KiB (411. KiB/s)
http://stable.melpa.org/.../mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar 100.0% of 300.0 KiB (419. KiB/s)
output path `/gnu/store/gdwf9rsqvvqqb77qkgpp94w8k8z1i6wf-mmm-mode-0.5.4.tar'
should have sha256 hash `1llkzb6d978ym3zv3yfzwj0w5zzmmj3ksrm5swrx1papxcnqnkb9',
instead has `1kjc41nlsf7qxmmy9mrzk6myinjvc550zl5ia0ivvdz945x39yay'
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
What went wrong here?
Mark