guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] guix: build: Add transitive source building.


From: Eric Bavier
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] guix: build: Add transitive source building.
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:19:20 -0500

Revisiting this (old) thread...

>Eric Bavier <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> * guix/scripts/build.scm (%options): Add --sources option.
>>   (package-sources, package-direct-sources)
>>   (package-transitive-sources, package-source-derivations): New
>>   procedures.
>>   (options->derivations)[--sources]: Use them.
>> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix build): Document --sources option.
>> * tests/guix-build.sh: Add tests.
>
>[...]
>
>> @item --sources
>> +An extension of the @code{--source} option.  If a package's source is
>
>What about starting with a couple of sentences that better describe what
>it does and what the use case is, like:
>
>  Fetch and return the source of @var{package-or-derivation} and all
>    their dependencies, recursively.  This is a handy way to obtain a
>      local copy of all the source code needed to build @var{packages},
>        allowing you to eventually build them even without network
>    access.

I liked your wording, so I used it ;)

>BTW, what happens when one passes arguments that are not packages?
>Like:
>
>  guix build --sources /gnu/store/...-foo.drv

It behaves in the way 'guix build -S' currently behaves with a
derivation, it just builds the derivation.  It might be interesting if
it examined the derivation and built any sources associated with it, but
that can be a later patch.

>> +  --sources[=TYPE]       build source derivations; TYPE may
>> optionally be one
>> +                         of \"package\", \"all\" (default), or
>> \"transitive\"."))
>
>No period.

Good catch, thanks.

>> +(define (package-sources package)
>
>This procedure appears to be unused (and is awkward anyway ;-)).

Removed.

>> +(define (package-direct-sources package)
>> +  "Return all source origins associated with PACKAGE; including
>> origins in
>> +PACKAGE's inputs."
>> +  `(,@(or (and=> (package-source package) list) '())
>> +    ,@(filter-map (match-lambda
>> +                   ((_ (? origin? orig) _ ...)
>> +                    orig)
>> +                   (_ #f))
>> +                  (package-direct-inputs package))))
>> +
>> +(define (package-transitive-sources package)
>> +  "Return PACKAGE's direct sources, and its input sources,
>> recursively."
>> +  (delete-duplicates
>> +   (concatenate (filter-map (match-lambda
>> +                             ((_ (? origin? orig) _ ...)
>> +                              (list orig))
>> +                             ((_ (? package? p) _ ...)
>> +                              (package-direct-sources p))
>> +                             (_ #f))
>> +                            (bag-transitive-inputs
>> +                             (package->bag package))))))
>
>Perhaps these two could go to (guix packages), with a test in
>tests/packages.scm.

Done in patch [1/2].

>> +# foo.tar.gz
>> +guix build -d -S foo
>> +guix build -d -S foo | grep -e 'foo\.tar\.gz'
>
>Nice tests, thanks for taking the time!

No problem.  I kinda like writing tests. :)


Eric Bavier (2):
  guix: packages: Add package-direct-sources and
    package-transitive-sources.
  guix: build: Add transitive source building.

 doc/guix.texi          |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 guix/packages.scm      |   24 ++++++++++++++
 guix/scripts/build.scm |   55 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
 guix/tests.scm         |   10 +++++-
 tests/guix-build.sh    |   82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tests/packages.scm     |   30 +++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]