Re: guix-shell?

[Ludovic Courtès]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:

> What about:
>
>   1. Computing the list of search-path-specifications of all the
>      transitive inputs of the package, the way ‘package-derivation’
>      does it;
>
>   2. Computing, based on these specifications and all the input
>      derivations, the actual search paths, the way ‘set-paths’ does it?

As discussed on IRC, that won’t work because ‘build-system’
implementations augment the search path specifications on their own, and
there’s no good way from the outside to tell what these are.

Bummer.

Ludo’.