guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Symlinks to generic names


From: John Darrington
Subject: Re: Symlinks to generic names
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 08:46:58 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 08:34:23AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
     John Darrington <address@hidden> skribis:
     
     > Some software (rightly or wrongly) tries to build with "lex" and "yacc" 
.  Guix does not provide these.
     > Instead we have "flex" and "bison".  Most operating systems have 
symbolic links lex -> flex and yacc -> bison.
     > Shouldn't we provide these too?
     
     We had a similar discussion for ‘cc’ vs. ‘gcc’, but in practice ‘cc’ has
     been rare enough that it’s not worth bothering.

     I believe Autoconf-based packages do not have any problems with ‘flex’
     and ‘bison’.  What package was it?  How hard is it to work around?
     
It's probably not too hard.  It just seems to me, that it makes more sense to 
do the 
workaround in 1 package, than in N.

J'

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]