[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A value for "nothing"
From: |
David Pirotte |
Subject: |
Re: A value for "nothing" |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 19:45:28 -0300 |
> You're right about null? being a problem. `Nothing` suggests an option
> type. What about 'nada' or 'nix'?
I'd call it
tinn
this is not nothing
or
tin
this is nothing
[ and tin, apart from the chemical, has a few of its meaning associated
[ with the function of a 'container' (tin can, tin box ...)
but we'd loose the fun
pgpk_2lW3eIBm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/13
- Message not available
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", John Cowan, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Keith Wright, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing",
David Pirotte <=