[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Mar 2017 15:13:40 +0100 |
2017-03-05 15:09 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Here some timing values
>>
>> (1)
>> lilypond-2.19.52 using guile 1.8.7
>> (I would have prefered to build lilypond with a guile-1.8.8 build from
>> the guile-repository. Though my try to build it from the
>> branch_release-1-8 failed. Instead attempting to fix it, I then used a
>> released lilypond-version)
>>
>> real 8m16.191s
>> user 6m39.864s
>> sys 0m10.860s
>>
>> (2)
>> guile-2.0.14 build from guile-git-repository, branch
>> remotes/origin/stable-2.0
>> lilypond-2.19.56, build from local branch dev/guile-v2.2-work
>>
>> real 34m11.762s
>> user 45m11.316s
>> sys 0m5.604s
>>
>> (3)
>> guile-2.1.7 build from guile-git-repository, branch master
>> (I've got this warning:
>> configure: WARNING: *** GNU Readline is too old on your system.
>> configure: WARNING: *** You need readline version 2.1 or later.
>> No idea whether this may have an impact on lilyponds compiling-time
>> I'll have to test.)
>> lilypond-2.19.56, build from local branch dev/guile-v2.2-work
>>
>> real 67m29.132s
>> user 93m14.812s
>> sys 0m7.332s
>
> Same compilation options?
Yep.
To get comparable results I always did exactly the same, for building
the guile-versions as well as for building lilypond.
Doing all tests with a fresh restarted computer.
Cheers,
Harm
> This looks like a surprisingly serious
> regression compared to 2.0.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, (continued)
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Amirouche, 2017/03/01
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2017/03/04
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/04
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/05
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, David Kastrup, 2017/03/05
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/05
- Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Andy Wingo, 2017/03/06
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Thomas Morley, 2017/03/08
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), David Kastrup, 2017/03/08
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2017/03/09
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/09
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Paul, 2017/03/09
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/10
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Paul, 2017/03/10
- Re: Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Thomas Morley, 2017/03/12