[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: Introducing Upmf
From: |
Aljosha Papsch |
Subject: |
Fwd: Re: Introducing Upmf |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:51:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I forgot to choose "reply all".
- -------- Original-Nachricht --------
Von: Aljosha Papsch <address@hidden>
Gesendet: Wed Feb 27 09:45:28 MEZ 2013
An: address@hidden
Betreff: Re: Introducing Upmf
address@hidden schrieb:
>Hello!
>
>Aljosha Papsch <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> I would like to introduce a project I've been working on recently and
>which makes use of GUILE.
>>
>> The project is a source based package manager and is written mostly
>in Scheme. It features the standard paxkage manager facilities,
>installing, removing and searching for packages. Upmf also makes use of
>GNU Stow for the final installation (though not yet integrated).
>
>Are you aware of GNU Guix <http://gnu.org/s/guix> and GNU SourceInstall
><http://gnu.org/s/sourceinstall/>?
>
>How would you position Upmf compared to those?
>
>Perhaps we should join efforts.
>
>Ludo’.
Hi!
Thanks for taking your time! Before I compare Upmf with those two you suggested
let me say that I merely played around a little and before 1 month would be
gone I reached the 0.5 release, so I thought I'd introduce it here.
To the two other projects:
Before hitting 0.2, I took a look at https://gnu.org/manual/manual to find
similar projects and in this regard I found Source Installer. However, this
projects seems to target the desktop user with a GUI, whereas Upmf wants to be
a simple command line tool. Additionally, Source Installer doesn't seem too
active to me.
As for Guix: I seem to have overlooked it when I first searched the list.
Looking at it now, Guix seems to be more grown. For example Upmf' package
format seems to be more simple-stricken. Also, Upmf code isn't based on
anything and it was just "cluttered away" in the last weeks.
To conclude I would say, Guix and Upmf are very similar, though your project
seems to be more advanced, despite the version number. However, I still have to
try out Guix. I don't know whether I can do this today or tomorrow, since in
these weeks I'm mostly offline on my desktop machine.
Best regards!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8
iQE+BAEBCAAoBQJRLeVGIRxBbGpvc2hhIFBhcHNjaCA8bWlzY0BycGFwc2NoLmRl
PgAKCRD4/JTYsEm1or9SB/4zDnFgDbijd563Lfq3issBdrF6kkoSPou1XBiqblbV
Mbsvll1TsZRaUjsmuYTavqvhYMWUFTGFwqT2RtXfWaHV9fs0INLRadF2DxZmeKHp
pMngnms9iZQxvtIEKu6cBzHEWD483DDdVZBdc2AHffgLi02nueJhHd9ISRSVHI35
HwY32sQo5dWwBl/LWGjXRbgUiCIl2ZiSgSkRxbcqLoF1FJjlKNXGABikJ4TteHuC
pv3Pl6QbmkajS0f9yHnxcKtnO98QceLsXJwcClAvuyUALnepSo0v0X77+0Sothrv
AV9urUBso5ZdVDhEoJ9x8Hq+E+DiVCSFRicTpk9MgA2u
=YpaU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Introducing Upmf, Aljosha Papsch, 2013/02/26
- Fwd: Re: Introducing Upmf,
Aljosha Papsch <=