[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A bit further toward the flamewar
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: A bit further toward the flamewar |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:58:23 +0200 |
On 13 Oct 2011, at 23:14, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Did you know that Coq would only compile a function when it can prove
> that it terminates? That’s another kind of compiler-supported proof one
> quickly gets used to.
Termination is a non-deducable property. They look at a intuitionistic subset
of programs.
Hans
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, (continued)
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Andy Wingo, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Linas Vepstas, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Andy Wingo, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Hans Aberg, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Panicz Maciej Godek, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, rixed, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/10/13
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Hans Aberg, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, rixed, 2011/10/14
- Re: A bit further toward the flamewar, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/10/14
Re: Why is guile still so slow?, Andy Wingo, 2011/10/12
Re: Why is guile still so slow?, John Lewis, 2011/10/12