[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...)
From: |
Clinton Ebadi |
Subject: |
Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...) |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:14:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
> currently:
> (define-module (foo)
> #:use-module (a b c)
> #:use-module ((d e f) #:select (x y z))
> #:export (bar))
>
> proposed:
> (define-module (foo)
> #:use-modules
> (a b c)
> ((d e f) #:select (x y z))
> #:export (bar))
>
> that is, `#:use-modules X Y Z' would be exactly equivalent
> to `#:use-module X #:use-module Y #:use-module Z'.
I would prefer something with the syntax
#:use-modules ((a b c)
((d e f) #:select (x y z)))
Which eliminates the indentation issues and brings it more in line
with the syntax of Common Lisp's defpackage :use clause. Insert
generic comment about consistent syntax here.
--
"Karen loved animals. Unfortunately the cheetahs betrayed her trust,"
Libot said.
- rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/10/04
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Mike Gran, 2007/10/04
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/04
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...),
Clinton Ebadi <=
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Klaus Schilling, 2007/10/05
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Keith Wright, 2007/10/05
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/10/06
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Keith Wright, 2007/10/07
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/10/07
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/07
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/10/07
- Re: rfc (define-module ... #:use-modules ...), Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/07