[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: null terminated strings
|
From: |
Andreas Voegele |
|
Subject: |
Re: null terminated strings |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:17:52 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Roland Orre writes:
> On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 10:10, Andreas Voegele wrote:
>
>> "Remove calls to SCM_STRING_COERCE_0TERMINATION_X. Since the
>> substring type is gone, all strings are 0-terminated anyway."
>
> Such a statement is very worrying. What happened to the promises
> that all substrings will be shared strings?
I'm new to Guile. I don't know why shared strings were removed from
Guile, but things were probably simplified greatly by this decision.
I think that it is very useful to zero terminate all strings since
embedding and extending Guile becomes easier.
It seems that you'll have to stick to Thien-Thi Nguyen's Guile
version, available at http://www.glug.org/, if you need shared
strings.
- argz SMOB, Brian S McQueen, 2004/01/05
- Re: argz SMOB, Daniel Skarda, 2004/01/06
- Re: argz SMOB, Brian S McQueen, 2004/01/15
- Re: argz SMOB, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/15
- null terminated strings (was: argz SMOB), Andreas Voegele, 2004/01/16
- Message not available
- Re: null terminated strings,
Andreas Voegele <=
- Re: null terminated strings, Roland Orre, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Andreas Voegele, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Brian S McQueen, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Tom Lord, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Roland Orre, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Ken Anderson, 2004/01/19
- Re: null terminated strings, Per Bothner, 2004/01/19
- Re: null terminated strings, Ken Anderson, 2004/01/19