[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch: executable modules support with "guile -e ENTRYPOINT"
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: patch: executable modules support with "guile -e ENTRYPOINT" |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Oct 2003 16:10:31 -0400 |
From: Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:49:47 +0200
I think that's a very good idea. Indeed, I think it is so good that
we should not reserve it for the -e option and should instead find a
general syntax for writing non-local names. Your proposed syntax
"MODULE-NAME PROC-NAME" does not work in Scheme code, but what about
it's not necessary from scheme because the module system provides enough
lower-level procs that the user can choose whatever syntax they want to
look at, in scheme. see, for example, module (ttn moduleutils) where
`@' has been doing such a thing for a few years now.
if you don't like how `@' behaves, or is named or is implemented, that's
the point; you don't have to. it's in "user space".
[cc trimmed.]
thi