Re: guile -s is it necessary?

[Rob Browning]

address@hidden writes:

> Note that the second form is not only convenient on the
> command line but also simplifies your trustworthy hash-bang
> line. As far as I know, unadorned arguments are not yet
> used in guile, so this would be a backward-compatible
> embellishment/enuglyment.

What about things like:

  guile -s foo.scm arg-to-foo another-arg-to-foo

or

  guile -e main -s foo.scm arg-to-foo another-arg-to-foo

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD