guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why asyncs were created


From: Tom Lord
Subject: Re: why asyncs were created
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:05:49 -0700 (PDT)

        > As a clarification, I have in mind to keep the "async" name and the
        > "async" behavior, but an async does not need to continue to be an
        > opaque object; it could just be a normal procedure that is used in a
        > special way.


Ah -- a representation issue, not a semantic issue?

What replaces the `got_it' flag in an async object?  I.e., the bit 
that says an async needs to be run, but could not be run when the
low-level or user-supplied signal was delivered?

-t






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]