[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Threads and asyncs
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Threads and asyncs |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 16:36:48 -0700 (PDT) |
> If Guile never budges on the stack issue, I would still be
> inclined to see it as an implementation optimized for cases
> when the C stack is used heavily.
And, not to reopen old wounds or restart old fights ---
RnRS is plainly wrong on (eq? #f '()) .... that's the biggest
obstacle.
Indeed, after resuming hacking emacs lisp in recent history, I'm
starting to think that the old CL bit of:
(car nil) => nil
(cdr nil) => nil
is also not a bad idea. "Protective errors" are often wrong.
-t
- Threads and asyncs, Marius Vollmer, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Rob Browning, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Rob Browning, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Tom Lord, 2002/09/02
- Re: Threads and asyncs, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/09/02