[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defining new character names?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: defining new character names? |
Date: |
21 Aug 2002 20:01:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
> I think that it is a bad idea to make Guile's characters
> encoding-specific. This is not the right way to internationalize
> Guile.
>
> Instead, we should change Guile's characters to Unicode. Then, of
> course, it makes sense to allow Unicode character names (and ISO 8879
> character entities) for #\ syntax.
Yep, agreed. We should wait with extensible character names until we
have a good plan for unicode/mule/whatever support in Guile.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- Re: defining new character names?, (continued)
- Re: defining new character names?, Lars J. Aas, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, rm, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Matthias Koeppe, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Lars J. Aas, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, rm, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Matthias Koeppe, 2002/08/27
Re: defining new character names?, Matthias Koeppe, 2002/08/20
Re: defining new character names?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Keith Wright, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, rm, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Keith Wright, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Keith Wright, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/21
- Re: defining new character names?, Keith Wright, 2002/08/22
- Re: defining new character names?, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/22