[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x"
|
From: |
Chris Cramer |
|
Subject: |
Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x" |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 02:44:04 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:33:54AM -0400, Keith Wright wrote:
> Boy are you asking for flamage. Ask again when you are ready for
> a quiz on pages 581-608 of Common Lisp: The Language
> by Guy L. Steele Jr. (Digital Press)
Could you summarize for those of us who are not as familiar with Common
Lisp? I have no idea what problems there could be with using something
like printf with Lisp. Not that it's a burning desire of mine, since we
already have format, but now you've got me wondering.
--
C. Ray C. aka Christopher Cramer
address@hidden
http://www.pyro.net/~crayc/
- format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Steve Tell, 2001/10/15
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Per Bothner, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Keith Wright, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x",
Chris Cramer <=
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Kyle Cronan, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Dale P. Smith, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Steve Tell, 2001/10/17
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Martin Grabmueller, 2001/10/18
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/26
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Keith Wright, 2001/10/16
- Re: format equivalent of printf "%3.1f", "%03x", Keith Wright, 2001/10/16