[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_? |
Date: |
11 May 2001 09:18:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
"Lars J. Aas" <address@hidden> writes:
> Maintaining separate private and public header files takes more work
> (and since I'm not doing it my vote doesn't count for much), but I
> think it is worth it.
I'm happy with either, though I tend to agree.
Once the files have been created, it's mostly just a matter of knowing
which file to C-x C-f when.
--
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, (continued)
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jeff Read, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Ken Fox, 2001/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jeff Read, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Jürgen A. Erhard, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/12
- more on continuations, Bill Schottstaedt, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/13
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/14
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/05/15