[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: To gh_ or not to gh_? |
Date: |
06 May 2001 02:50:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
Sam Tregar <address@hidden> writes:
> Suggestions?
The gh_ interface is not going away any time soon, if at all, but it
is in certain regards a second class citizen compared to the scm_
interface. This is mostly because it has been neglected in the recent
past. The scm_ interface is the `real' libguile API (if there is such
a thing) in the sense that it covers all of libguile. It is also
difficult and surprising at times, while the gh_ interface aims to be
cleaner.
So, I would suggest to stick to the cleaner parts of the scm_
interface. The trick is of course to identify these cleaner parts...
Well, not much of an advice, I'm afraid. We are currently sorting out
what to do with the gh_ interface in the future, but even if it is
going to be removed, this will be a long time off, and the trnasition
will be smooth.
- To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/04
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/04
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Bobby D. Bryant, 2001/05/04
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/05
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Keith Wright, 2001/05/07
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Bill Gribble, 2001/05/07
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Evan Prodromou, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Neil Jerram, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Keith Wright, 2001/05/11
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/12
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Rob Browning, 2001/05/10
- Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?, Sam Tregar, 2001/05/10