[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
From: |
Jed Davis |
Subject: |
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed? |
Date: |
02 May 2001 02:43:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.100 |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> By using C++ inheritance and virtual functions, you might be able to
> hide some of the hair.
>
A while ago I wrote a template class to "wrap" any C++ type as a smob;
new and delete become the appropriate GC-aware functions, a
GC-inspired deallocation called the destructor (I think), etc. It
actually wasn't that hard, between the smob documentation and a copy
of Stroustrup. I may or may not have the source floating around somewhere.
--Jed, who never got the print function to demangle the names it got
out of RTTI, though, let along decanonify them.
--
"But life wasn't yes-no, on-off. Life was shades of gray, and rainbows
not in the order of the spectrum." -- L. E. Modesitt, Jr., _Adiamante_
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, (continued)
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Bill Gribble, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/07
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/07
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/14
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/14
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/15
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Brett Viren, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Dale P. Smith, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?,
Jed Davis <=