[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta)
From: |
Christopher Allan Webber |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta) |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:03:04 -0600 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1 |
Matt Wette writes:
>> On Dec 16, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Matt Wette <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> OK. This is gonna be hard to trace down.
>>
>> I am on a Mac running Sierra, 10.12.2. At work I am running 10.9 I believe,
>> and I see the same behavior.
>>
>>
>> If I compile with gcc 6.2 or gcc4.9, but no extra flags besides —prefix, I
>> get the following failure:
>>
>> FAIL: numbers.test: string->number: valid complex number strings
>>
>> and trace this down to
>>
>> meta/guile -c '(display (eqv? (imag-part (string->number "address@hidden"))
>> -0.0))' => #f
>
> I am now compiling with clang-3.9 and getting fatal errors. Stay tuned …
Is clang supported? I didn't think it was.
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), (continued)
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/10
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/11
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/12
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/12
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), dsmich, 2016/12/12
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Freja Nordsiek, 2016/12/13
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/16
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/16
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta),
Christopher Allan Webber <=
- Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/16
Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/11
Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Matt Wette, 2016/12/20
Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta), Daniel Llorens, 2016/12/10