Re: [PATCH] Colorized REPL

[Nala Ginrut]

On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 08:50 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 9 December 2012 05:35, Ian Price <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Or, you could use the package manager I keep pimping :)
> 
> Yes indeed, it works quite well.  As does just adding such files to a
> site- or user-local module path.
> 
> > (os process) might be reasonable, since we are forever complaining about
> > the popen module, but I don't see why we need (ansi term-color).
> 
> Yes, agree.  It is best to avoid adding some extra fluff (such as ansi
> color module, colored output, etc.) to the core when appropriate.
> Feature creep and all that is not a big win, makes guile generally
> /less/ embeddable, and such.
> 

(ice-9 colorized) has already had the useful part compatible with (ansi
term-color), you may checkout 'upstream' branch. So we don't have to add
(ansi term-color).

@ijp: yeah~what's the status about guildhall? Is there an official
release? And the main site for it?