Re: Guile Lua

[nalaginrut]

On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 22:07 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> nalaginrut <address@hidden> skribis:
> 
> > I'd like to know what work should the maintainer take? As I know there's
> > some work has been done, but it didn't merge into stable-2.0. What's the
> > rest work? Does it work now? 
> 
> I think the first task for you (congratulations! ;-)) or anyone else
> interested will be to check out the branch, build it, assess it, and
> tell us what it’s current status is.
> 

I switch to lua branch then compiled it and try, seems some bugs there,
it can't run successfully:
-------------------cut--------------------
scheme@(guile-user)> ,L lua
Happy hacking with Lua!  To switch back, type `,L scheme'.
lua@(guile-user)> x=1
[enter]
[enter]
[enter]
^CWhile reading expression:
ERROR: User interrupt
lua@(guile-user)> 
-------------------end--------------------

And I checked the code, it doen't use Guile inner LALR parser.
Anybody point me out what is the suggested parser implementation? The
inner scheme-LALR(which contains GLR also) or manual parser generator?
Which is better for a practical multi-lang implementation?

And is there anyone ever evaluated the efficiency about the non-scheme
language implemented within Guile? 
Anyway, this wouldn't be a big problem, since Guile could be the future
dynamic language compiler collection, it could be optimized later.

> Then, assuming it’s in a good shape, one would have to try running
> actual Lua programs, in search of bugs.  Along the way, these bugs would
> have to be fixed, and the test suite augmented accordingly.
> 
> Then the fine points regarding multi-language integration will have to
> be sorted out.  The manual will have to be updated.
> 
> When all this is in place, we can consider merging the branch.  I
> wouldn’t want to merge a half-baked front-end.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Ludo’.
> 
>