[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ? |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:17:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
[bunch of examples]
> Which of the above would you consider unspecified?
As the Scheme standard clearly states, all the ones comparing numbers
with eq?. You find some of them surprising; that is your problem ;) The
answer is to not compare numbers with eq?.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Bug in documentation for eq? ?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, Andy Wingo, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, Noah Lavine, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, Andy Wingo, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, Andy Wingo, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, Andy Wingo, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, David Kastrup, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, Andy Wingo, 2012/06/20
- Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ?, Pierpaolo Bernardi, 2012/06/20