[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Functional record "setters", a different approach |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2012 18:25:02 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
>> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>>> I’ll let you see whether/how you can borrow from this in your code, if
>>> that’s fine with you.
>>
>> Okay, will do.
>
> Any progress on this? ;-)
I apologize for dropping on the ball on this. The primary concern I
have with my current approach is that 'define-tagged-inlinable' adds
several more huge bloated syntax-objects to the getter macros. Of
course, as usual, this bloat will never be used, but everyone must pay
for 'datum->syntax' whether they use it or not :-(
> I’m happy to help with updating the docs, for instance, if you want.
That would be very helpful, thanks!
Mark