[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)? |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:52:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
> But, in the event that David wants to continue with his current
> strategy, there are other things that can be done. David, did you know
> that Guile's evaluator is implemented in Scheme? That means that if you
> want an evaluator with different semantics -- for example, something
> closer to Kernel[0], as David appears to want -- then you can implement
> an evaluator that provides for fexprs and the like, and it will run
> about as well as Guile's evaluator.
Indeed. FWIW, Skribilo [0] has its own input language, which is similar
to but different from Scheme, so it has its own reader and its own
evaluator, the latter being mostly a wrapper around ‘eval’. This
strategy has worked well, and portably between 1.8 and 2.0.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[0] http://nongnu.org/skribilo/
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, (continued)
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Noah Lavine, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Mark H Weaver, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Andy Wingo, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/13
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/13
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/13
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, David Kastrup, 2011/12/14
- Re: Anything better for delayed lexical evaluation than (lambda () ...)?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/12/14