[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: benchmarks vs racket
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: benchmarks vs racket |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:46:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
I've added some historical numbers as a fifth column here (hah!),
corresponding to our performance at 1.9.7, relative to mzscheme then.
Assuming mzscheme has improved, this is pretty great improvement over
the last 18 months.
On Wed 12 Oct 2011 18:24, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> fastest guile mzscheme guile 1.9.7/mzscheme 4.2.4
> conform 1433 ms 1 - 6.36
> cpstack 216 ms 7.62 1 16.55
> ctak 2143 ms 1 1.01 -
> dderiv 219 ms 5.00 1 6.62
> deriv 191 ms 4.86 1 5.3
> destruct 1570 ms 1 - 17
> div 252 ms 5.75 1 15
> dynamic 1423 ms 1 - 2.57
> dynamic2 1213 ms 1.18 1 4.28
> earley 323 ms 1.87 1 7.54
> fft 728 ms 5.53 1 8.83
> graphs 249 ms 8.90 1 16.96
> lattice 12290 ms 1 - 17.9
> lattice2 1584 ms 7.75 1 17.58
> maze 1440 ms 1 - 8.75
> maze2 180 ms 8.51 1 25.85
> mazefun 415 ms 5.64 1 13.92
> nboyer 4428 ms 1.53 1 8.79
> nestedloop 333 ms 8.14 1 25.7
> nfa 491 ms 14.12 1 32.01
> nqueens 225 ms 5.73 1 14.62
> nucleic2 948 ms 5.72 1 9.48
> paraffins 172 ms 2.67 1 7.22
> peval 1840 ms 1 - 11.16
> puzzle 119 ms 5.46 1 12.99
> sboyer 3911 ms 5.81 1 18.69
> scheme 647 ms 1 - 7.18
> scheme2 169 ms 3.86 1 8.84
> sort1 2443 ms 1 - 9.12
> tak 169 ms 8.47 1 15.45
> takl 269 ms 8.81 1 16.9
> takr 1284 ms 1.16 1 4.23
> takr2 1352 ms 1.09 1 4.46
> triangle 439 ms 7.71 1 12.44
Andy