[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295 |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:15:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
On Fri 25 Mar 2011 18:58, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> "Andy Wingo" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> bdw-gc 6.8 compatibility (hopefully)
>
> Aarrrgh. The intent has always been to support 7.x only (bdw-gc.h has
> compatibility stuff for historical reasons), which is already enough
> work. ;-) The README and various responses we posted in the past are
> consistent.
>
> WDYT?
I think we've been sending mixed messages. Some people want to build on
Debian stable, which has seemed to work fine. In this case I wasn't
sure when these interfaces were added: 7.0, 7.1, or what, and I was away
from the tubes when I was hacking (though I did have a 6.8 tarball). So
I added this code.
In short, it doesn't much matter to me :) We can program to the 7.x
interfaces, and if people want to use old buggy software, then we tell
them to upgrade. But if it keeps working, no problem, right?
Dunno...
A
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/25
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/25
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/27
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295, Neil Jerram, 2011/03/28
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/28
- Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, stable-2.0, updated. v2.0.0-124-g5f0d295, Neil Jerram, 2011/03/28