[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:58:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110013 (No Gnus v0.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun 20 Mar 2011 22:31, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> Thus ‘%target-type’ would be inappropriate IMO because the target could
>> be chosen at run-time and it could be anything.
>>
>> ‘guile-tools compile --target=TRIPLET’ would be fine with me.
>
> I see. Yes that sounds fine; perhaps we could have %target-type, but
> have it be a fluid. Does that make sense?
Yes, agreed.
At some point there will have to be a triplet → arch → endianness
conversion. I’d rather have that conversion occur as close to the UI as
possible—i.e., close to ‘scripts/compile.scm’—rather than deep down in
(system base compile) because the triplet string is really a UI notion IMO.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, (continued)
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/06
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Andy Wingo, 2011/03/17
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/18
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Andy Wingo, 2011/03/19
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/20
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Andy Wingo, 2011/03/20
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/03/20
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Andy Wingo, 2011/03/20
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Andy Wingo, 2011/03/21
Re: Cross-compiling Guile 2.0, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/03/16