[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?
|
From: |
Andy Wingo |
|
Subject: |
Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:11:44 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu 24 Feb 2011 17:35, Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:
> If the library ABI is tweaked to code the version into a symbol name,
> this test could become a simple compile-and-link test. Of course, that
> approach has other issues, like getting backwards-compatible library
> upgrades to work without recompiling applications.
FWIW, Guile 2.0's library is "libguile-2.0.so". 2.2 will be "-2.2.so".
Most problems of this nature will be avoided in this way.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, nalaginrut, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Hans Aberg, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, nalaginrut, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Hans Aberg, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Ken Raeburn, 2011/02/22
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/02/23
- scm_listofnull, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/23
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Ken Raeburn, 2011/02/24
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Bruce Korb, 2011/02/24
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/25
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Hans Aberg, 2011/02/25
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/25
- Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil -- et al. ?, Hans Aberg, 2011/02/25
Re: SCM_BOOL_T became #nil ?, Mark H Weaver, 2011/02/22