Re: [PATCH] Miscellaneous for 2.0

[Andy Wingo]

Hi Mark,

I saw your message and thought this should hit the list:

On Sat 12 Feb 2011 20:45, Mark Weaver <address@hidden> writes:

> BTW, this is all based on my experience adding new number types to
> guile.  I have a local branch in which both arbitrary precision floats
> and complex numbers with arbitrary component types are implemented
> entirely in scheme, and all the core numeric procedures are
> implemented to full precision, including transcendental operations,
> and all of it passes numbers.test.  Even things like the numeric type
> predicates (number?, real? et al), and eqv? and equal? work as they
> should for these numbers.  I was trying to get it ready for 2.0, but
> decided to wait.

Very neat stuff!

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/