[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ECMAScript support broken?
From: |
Kan-Ru Chen |
Subject: |
Re: ECMAScript support broken? |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:52:59 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Here's a new version. I think the commit message is better - please
> let me know if this is not right. There's also a test for it.
> + `(apply (@ (language ecmascript impl) new-object)
I think if you use ,(@implv new-object) here it would be more consistent
with the ,(@implv new-array) case just above this code snippet :)
Kanru
--
A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good
book is a crime.
-- Gilbert Highet
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), (continued)
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/17
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/26
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/26
- Re: Sputnik test result, Andy Wingo, 2011/01/27
- Re: Sputnik test result, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/27
- Re: Sputnik test result, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/27
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?,
Kan-Ru Chen <=
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/04
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/04
Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/03