[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fix for expt bug
From: |
Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan |
Subject: |
Re: fix for expt bug |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2010 09:33:27 +0530 |
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ramakrishnan,
>
> Your fix is incorrect. You have assumed that (-a)^b = -(a^b),
Mark,
Yes, you are right. Not sure what I was thinking when I made the patch. :-(
> The reported bug is simply due to roundoff error. You must know
> something about complex numbers and specifically complex exponentials to
> understand what's happening here. The spurious imaginary part is
> actually quite miniscule compared with the real part. If one looks at
> these results in polar form, the complex argument (angle) should ideally
> be an exact zero, but is instead an inexact number very close to 0
> (about 2.45e-16 radians in this case).
>
> The most straightforward solution to this bug is to support a few
> special cases, such as:
>
> (-a)^b = -(a^b) (where a is positive real and b is an odd integer)
> (-a)^b = a^b (where a is positive real and b is an even integer)
Thanks. I will take a dig at doing this solution.
--
Ramakrishnan
- Re: fix for expt bug,
Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <=
- Re: fix for expt bug, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan, 2010/11/01
- Re: fix for expt bug, Mark H Weaver, 2010/11/02
- Re: fix for expt bug, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan, 2010/11/02
- Re: fix for expt bug, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan, 2010/11/02
- Re: fix for expt bug, Mark H Weaver, 2010/11/02
- Re: fix for expt bug, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/11/02
- Re: fix for expt bug, Mark H Weaver, 2010/11/02
- Re: fix for expt bug, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan, 2010/11/03
- Re: fix for expt bug, Mark H Weaver, 2010/11/03
- Re: fix for expt bug, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan, 2010/11/03