[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scheme@(guile-user)> considered ugly
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: scheme@(guile-user)> considered ugly |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:55:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm thinking that our prompt is really ugly. Sure, it's useful to know
> what language and module you're in (though you probably know the
> language). But I was just going over some docs and the prompt really
> makes it hard to read. The interaction transcript went like this:
I agree that this example is hard to read. That said, in reality,
there’d be some color (hello jao! :-)) and a blinking cursor, which make
things much better.
Also, FWIW, it’s customary to have $PS1 = address@hidden:\w]\$’, which is
graphically close to ‘LANG@(MODULE)>’.
> But what if we elide the language and deparen the module:
>
> guile-user> (define abc "hello")
Yes, that’s clearer.
Still, I had got used to seeing the language name, and it’s probably
good marketing-wise (though currently only Scheme works at the REPL, but
shh!) So I don’t know. No strong feelings.
Another option would be to keep the prompt but use a simpler one in the
manual, as is often done with shell transcripts.
Thanks,
Ludo’.