Re: Exposing more math functionality

[Andy Wingo]

On Fri 27 Aug 2010 08:44, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu 19 Aug 2010 09:04, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Regarding modf -- it seems that the R6RS extends the definition of
>> `modulo' (called `mod') to be defined over the real numbers.
>>
>>   (mod 10 3) => 1
>>   (mod 10 3.0) => 1.0
>>   (mod 10 3.1) => 0.7
>>
>> This appears to be a compatible extension of the R5RS' `modulo', so we
>> should just extend our definition. That way we can avoid adding another
>> symbol.
>
> This was a mistaken impression, something I realized while trying to
> implement this. From the R6RS rationale, section 11.6.6:
>
>     div and mod [...]

I was pointed to http://mumble.net/~campbell/tmp/division.txt today,
which is enlightening. I don't know what to do with it yet. I like the
snarky take on div0 and mod0 though ;)

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/