Re: On white-box tests

[Ludovic Courtès]

Mike Gran <address@hidden> writes:

> I wrote the string-internals tests to indicate to me when I'd done
> something that had unexpected side-effects.  They are intentionally
> white-box; they are intentionally reflexive.

OK, I understand now.  Then if it's useful to you, well, it's indeed
useful.  :-)

> But, I can see an equally valid argument for stripping them out once
> strings are no longer in flux,

Makes sense.

> for example at release 2.0, assuming it is bug free ;-) or perhaps
> 2.1.

But I'm sure it'll all be ready by 2.0 or even 1.9.3!  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo'.