[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quasisyntax broken?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Quasisyntax broken? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:15:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
> I think I filed one for Guile several years ago, and think you assume
> rightly;
Yes, you're on file.
> I guess that might be a problem; OTOH it would be (IMHO) kinda dumb to
> have to ignore/rewrite all the perfectly (L)GPL-compatible BSD- and
> MIT-licensed code that's out there, as you cannot expect the
> respective authors to all sign copyright assignments for Guile...
Yes, of course. We already have code not copyright FSF such as
`psyntax' and `match'.
Thanks,
Ludo'.
- Quasisyntax broken?, Andreas Rottmann, 2009/07/02
- Re: Quasisyntax broken?, Andy Wingo, 2009/07/23
- Re: Quasisyntax broken?, Andreas Rottmann, 2009/07/23
- Re: Quasisyntax broken?, Andy Wingo, 2009/07/23
- Re: Quasisyntax broken?, Andreas Rottmann, 2009/07/25
- Re: Quasisyntax broken?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Quasisyntax broken?, Andy Wingo, 2009/07/26
- Re: Quasisyntax broken?, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/07/26
- Re: Quasisyntax broken?, Neil Jerram, 2009/07/27